3 Years of Non-Stop Propaganda is Finally Falling Apart

*Edited to add resources (I will continue to add resources here as and when I find them)

As more and more propaganda from the last 3 years is exposed, know that the truth about this pandemic was always available to you from independent sources. I myself posted many such resources on my Facebook page. I’m totally blocked on Facebook now but as far as I know, my Facebook page is still up (though shadow banned) and you can look at all the resources I posted there: https://www.facebook.com/TheRealZarnaJoshi

The people who told you not to do your own research were trying to prevent you from seeing vital information that could help you and your community. Are you one of the people who fell for the propaganda? If you are, why did you fall for it? That’s a very important question that every person needs to ask themselves right now.

Watch and / or read the resources below and expand your mind beyond your propaganda algorithm bubble:

White background. Headline in purple font reads: “Secondary Bacterial Pneumonia Drove Many COVID-19 Deaths”. Below subheading in grey font reads: “Machine learning finds no evidence of cytokine storm in critically ill patients with COVID-19" — Screenshot May 2023 Northwestern University article. Image description: White background. Headline in dark purple font reads: “Secondary Bacterial Pneumonia Drove Many COVID-19 Deaths”. Below is a subheading in grey font that reads: “Machine learning finds no evidence of cytokine storm in critically ill patients with COVID-19”.

These are some of the May 2023 Northwestern University study findings:

““Those who were cured of their secondary pneumonia were likely to live, while those whose pneumonia did not resolve were more likely to die,” Singer said. “Our data suggested that the mortality related to the virus itself is relatively low, but other things that happen during the ICU stay, like secondary bacterial pneumonia, offset that.””
““The term ‘cytokine storm’ means an overwhelming inflammation that drives organ failure in your lungs, your kidneys, your brain and other organs,” Singer said. “If that were true, if cytokine storm were underlying the long length of stay we see in patients with COVID-19, we would expect to see frequent transitions to states that are characterized by multi-organ failure. That’s not what we saw.””
““The importance of bacterial superinfection of the lung as a contributor to death in patients with COVID-19 has been underappreciated, because most centers have not looked for it or only look at outcomes in terms of presence or absence of bacterial superinfection, not whether treatment is successful or not,” said study co-author Richard Wunderink, MD, who leads the Successful Clinical Response in Pneumonia Therapy Systems Biology Center at Northwestern.”

Meanwhile, a health advisor to the White House, Dr. Deborah Birx, admitted on April 7 2020 that US numbers of COVID-19 deaths were inflated:

A woman with blond hair style up, a grey coat and pink scarf is standing on a podium with the US flag behind her on the left. A White House sign behind directly behind her head. — Screenshot Video of Trump White House press briefing April 2020. Image description: A middle aged white woman with blond hair styled up, wearing a grey coat and pink scarf, standing on a podium with the US flag behind her to the left. A White House sign is behind directly behind her head. Video is 59 seconds long.

Screenshot 2023 Study from Cochrane Library. Image description: White background. Cochrane Library logo is a dark blue circle with purple vertical line going through the middle. Headline in center of image in black font reads: *“Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses”.* Beneath are listed the study authors in dark blue font: “Tom Jefferson, Liz Dooley, Eliana Ferroni, Lubna A Al-Ansary, Mieke L van Driel, Ghada A Bawazeer, Mark A Jones, Tammy C Hoffmann, Justin Clark, Elaine M Beller, Paul P Glasziou, John M Conly” Published January 30 2023.
Here is some of what the 2023 Cochrane study says:
“Compared with wearing no mask in the community studies only, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness/COVID‐like illness (9 studies; 276,917 people); and probably makes little or no difference in how many people have flu/COVID confirmed by a laboratory test (6 studies; 13,919 people). Unwanted effects were rarely reported; discomfort was mentioned.”
“Compared with wearing medical or surgical masks, wearing N95/P2 respirators probably makes little to no difference in how many people have confirmed flu (5 studies; 8407 people); and may make little to no difference in how many people catch a flu‐like illness (5 studies; 8407 people), or respiratory illness (3 studies; 7799 people). Unwanted effects were not well‐reported; discomfort was mentioned.”
“Following a hand hygiene programme may reduce the number of people who catch a respiratory or flu‐like illness, or have confirmed flu, compared with people not following such a programme (19 studies; 71,210 people), although this effect was not confirmed as statistically significant reduction when ILI and laboratory‐confirmed ILI were analysed separately. Few studies measured unwanted effects; skin irritation in people using hand sanitiser was mentioned.”

Here’s a study from Israel published April 2022:

Screenshot Image description: Study title in black font on white background reads: “The Incidence of Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Post COVID-19 Unvaccinated Patients—A Large Population-Based Study”. Below are listed the author names.

Here’s what the study concludes:

“Post COVID-19 infection was not associated with either myocarditis (aHR 1.08; 95% CI 0.45 to 2.56) or pericarditis (aHR 0.53; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.13). We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.”
“Our data suggest that there is no increase in the incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis in COVID-19 recovered patients compared to uninfected matched controls. Further longer-term studies will be needed to estimate the incidence of pericarditis and myocarditis in patients diagnosed with COVID-19.”

Here’s another study from Germany from November 27th 2022:

Study title in black font on white background reads: “Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination.” Below in blue font are listed the authors. Below that is the publication and year. — Screenshot Image description: Study title in black font on white background reads: “Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination.” Below in blue font are listed the authors. Below that is the publication where it was it published and date: “Clinical Research in Cardiology (2022)”

Here’s a quote from the study:

“Overall, autopsy findings indicated death due to acute arrhythmogenic cardiac failure. Thus, myocarditis can be a potentially lethal complication following mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.”

Article headline and subheading reads: "German chief pathologist sounds alarm on fatal vaccine injuries The director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg, Peter Schirmacher, has carried out over forty autopsies [...]" — Screenshot Image description: Article heading and subheading in black font on white background that reads: “German chief pathologist sounds alarm on fatal vaccine injuries // The director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg, Peter Schirmacher, has carried out over forty autopsies on people who had died within two weeks of their vaccination. Schirmacher expressed alarm over his findings.” Article is dated at the bottom left to August 3, 2021, 12:42 pm.
Here are two quotes from the article:
“Even if his results are only a snapshot, it is a dramatic one: 30 to 40 percent died from the vaccination itself. The pathologist cited “rare, severe side effects of the vaccination – such as cerebral vein thrombosis or autoimmune diseases”.”
“The head of the “Autopsy Working Group” in this association wanted to make general practitioners and health authorities aware of this. In other words, doctors of the patients who die within a few days or weeks after vaccination should apply for an autopsy in case of doubt or the health authorities should take action.”

Screenshot Image description: White background. Article headline in blue font reads: On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination”. Below are named the writers: Sucharit Bhakdi, MD and Arne Burkhardt, MD. The subheading in black font reads: “This text is a written summary of Dr. Bhakdi’s and Dr. Burkhardt’s presentations at the Doctors for COVID Ethics symposium that was live-streamed by UKColumn on December 10th, 2021. The two presentations can be viewed at the very beginning of the video recording of the symposium.”
Here are two quotes from the document:
“A natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) will in most individuals remain localized to the respiratory tract. In contrast, the vaccines cause cells deep inside our body to express the viral spike protein, which they were never meant to do by nature. Any cell which expresses this foreign antigen will come under attack by the immune system, which will involve both IgG antibodies and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. This may occur in any organ. We are seeing now that the heart is affected in many young people, leading to myocarditis or even sudden cardiac arrest and death. How and why such tragedies might causally be linked to vaccination has remained a matter of conjecture because scientific evidence has been lacking. This situation has now been rectified.”
“Histopathologic analysis show clear evidence of vaccine-induced autoimmune-like pathology in multiple organs.”

Here’s an NIH study on “underlying immune cellular and molecular mechanisms driving” cardiac tissue inflammation after vaccination, published May 2023:

Screenshot Image description: Study headline in black font on white background reads: “Cytokinopathy with aberrant cytotoxic lymphocytes and profibrotic myeloid response in SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine-associated myocarditis”. Below are listed the study authors in smaller blue font.

Here are two quotes from the article:

“Here, we investigated a cohort of patients who developed myocarditis and/or pericarditis with elevated troponin, B-type natriuretic peptide, and C-reactive protein levels as well as cardiac imaging abnormalities shortly after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.”
“Together, our results demonstrate up-regulation in inflammatory cytokines and corresponding lymphocytes with tissue-damaging capabilities, suggesting a cytokine-dependent pathology, which may further be accompanied by myeloid cell-associated cardiac fibrosis.”

Here is a BMJ Paediatrics article about child abuse during the lockdown, dated 2022:

“For children, the collateral damage of the COVID-19 pandemic response has been considerable: ‘nearly insurmountable’ educational losses, deteriorating mental health,2 low routine childhood vaccination rates, 39 billion missed school meals by January 2021 and millions of estimated life-years lost among students in the USA alone. It is difficult to deny the harmful impact of lockdowns on children, who are society’s most vulnerable members. In this paper, we use the framework of evidence-based medicine to argue that child abuse is another negative side effect of COVID-19 lockdowns.”
“In Uganda, for example, there was a 1565% increase in the average number of calls per day to the Uganda Child Helpline in the first month of lockdown. Yet, even wealthy nations in the West did not escape unscathed. In the UK, there was a 1493% increase in cases of abusive head trauma at Great Ormond Street Hospital. In France, there was an 89% increase in national child abuse helpline calls, a 48% increase in home visits by law enforcement officers and a 50% increase in the relative frequency of child abuse hospitalisations. Furthermore, there appears to have been insidious changes with potentially long-term effects which are more difficult to measure. In the Netherlands, for example, there was a 32% increase in previously rare harsh parenting behaviours, including shaking and name calling.”

Breaking down the facts about lockdowns and what we could have done instead:

Study from Finland:

Screenshot Image description: Article headline in black font on a white background reads: “Impact of face masks on COVID-19 incidence in children in Finland”
Here is a section of the article:
“The study results showed that there were no significant differences in APC values in August between Helinski and Turku. However, the APC value was higher in Turku in September and November while the APC value was higher in Helsinki in October.
Notably, the incidence of COVID-19 in children aged seven to nine years was similar to that in children aged 10 to 12 years, while no such similarity was observed for adults aged 30 to 49 years in the two cities.
Overall, the study findings showed that there were no substantial differences in the incidence of COVID-19 after wearing face masks in children aged between 10 to 12 years and residing in Helsinki and Turku.”

Take a look at the Conchrane study again, from international network Cochrane Library, headquartered in the UK, dated Jan 2023:

Screenshot Image description: Study headline from Cochrane Database in black font on white background reads: “Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses” Below are names of authors of study. Date given below reads “30 January 2023”.

Here are some excerpts of the study:

"Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza/SARS-CoV-2 compared to not wearing masks […].”
“The use of a N95/P2 respirators compared to medical/surgical masks probably makes little or no difference for the objective and more precise outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza infection […].”
“One previously reported ongoing RCT has now been published and observed that medical/surgical masks were non‐inferior to N95 respirators in a large study of 1009 healthcare workers in four countries providing direct care to COVID-19 patients.”
“There were no clear differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators in healthcare workers when used in routine care to reduce respiratory viral infection.”

Screenshot Image description: An article headline in black font on a white background that reads: “NEJM’s Disappointing Decision to Publish the Boston School Mask Study // A point-by-point analysis of Cowger TL, et al.” Below on the left reads: “Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, PhD” and the date of the article “Nov 12”.
Here is a quote from the article:
“Why did NEJM publish this paper, which has many issues I will discuss below, when it runs counter to randomized data, and a nicely done regression discontinuity study from Spain? It also runs counter to a huge body of pre-pandemic randomized data finding limited to no effectiveness of cloth, surgical or N95 masks against influenza.”

Here is a study from Harvard, Oxford, and John Hopkins scientists, dated Sept 2022:

Screenshot Image description: Article headline in black font on a white background reads: “COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and Five Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities”. Article is dated below to 12 Sept 2022.
Here are some quotes from the study:
“Our estimate shows that university COVID-19 vaccine mandates are likely to cause net expected harms to young healthy adults—between 18 and 98 serious adverse events requiring hospitalisation and 1373 to 3234 disruptions of daily activities—that is not outweighed by a proportionate public health benefit.”
“The continued policy of two-dose mandates may represent status quo bias: when a rule is normalised it remains even when it has no (current) rational basis.”
“Though universities might take pride in being places that permit the free exchange of ideas, mandates reduce the scope for reasoned debate regarding scientific uncertainties or conflicts of ethical values. For example, how many universities have held public debates about mandatory COVID-19 vaccination?”
“The fact that such policies were implemented despite controversy among experts and without updating the sole publicly available risk-benefit analysis to the current Omicron variants suggests a profound lack of transparency in scientific and regulatory policy making.”

British Medical Journal Editor Dr. Peter Doshi spoke on an expert COVID-19 vaccine efficacy panel convened by US Senator Ron Johnson in November 2021:

Screenshot Dr. Peter Doshi speaking on expert panel on vaccine efficacy. Click to watch the video.
Image description: A brown-skinned man with short black hair and glasses, wearing a dark suit and blue shirt, is sitting at a table with placards with numbers on them behind him. There is a mic on the table in front of him that he is speaking into. The name plaque in front of him says Dr. Peter Doshi.

This is some of what Dr. Peter Doshi said:

“[…] those who claimed the trails showed the vaccines were highly effective in saving lives were wrong. The trails did not demonstrate this. […] The trials did not show a reduction in death […].”
“I am one of those academics that argues that these mRNA products that everybody calls vaccines are qualitatively different than standard vaccines. And so I found it fascinating to learn that Miriam Webster changed its definition of ‘vaccine’ early this year. mRNA products did not meet the definition of ‘vaccine’ that has been in place for 15 years at Miriam Webster but the definition was expanded such that mRNA products are now ‘vaccines’.”

Meanwhile, Global North enforced COVID policies continue to harm Africans:

Dr. Pierre Kory, former associate professor and chief of the Critical Care Service at the University of Wisconsin, published “The War on Ivermectin” in June 2023.

Screenshot The War on Ivermectin book by Dr. Pierre Kory and Jenna McCarthy, published June 2023
Image description: A book cover showing a dark yellow background edged at the top and bottom with slanted yellow and black caution tape. The words are in black font and all block letters. Title reads “IVERMECTIN” with subtitle below reads: “The medicine that saved millions and could have ended the pandemic”. Beneath is a triangle outline in red. Inside the red triangle outline is a round white pill. Below is the name of the authors with “foreword by Del Bigtree”.

This is from the book’s blurb:

“Prescribe or promote it and you’ll be called a right-wing quack, be banned from social media, or lose your license to practice medicine. And yet, entire countries wiped out the virus with it, and more than ninety-five studies now show it to be unequivocally effective in preventing and treating COVID-19.”
“Although numerous studies and epidemiologic data have shown that millions of lives were saved globally with the systematic use of ivermectin, many more millions perished. This carnage was the direct result of what Dr. Kory eventually discovered to be the pharmaceutical industry’s silent but deadly war on generic medicines and the corrupt, captured medical and media systems that allow it to continue.”

Here are some quotes from Dr. Kory:

“I truly believed that the pandemic would be over in a matter of months—just as soon as our review paper was published.”
“No matter how many thousands of patients we treated with near perfect results, our successes were ignored, maligned, or outright dismissed.”
“The analyses showed that in every region where ivermectin had been distributed, cases and deaths peaked and then rapidly fell. Further, in the one place where ivermectin had not been distributed, Peru’s capital of Lima, cases and deaths continued to rage.”

A recent Danish 2023 paper showed that certain batches had higher rates of adverse impacts compared to other batches:

Unless the people rise up Pfizer will keep pushing their propaganda.

From David Denton, Pfizer CFO and Executive VP from their earnings call with investors:

“Regarding our COVID-19-related revenues, we now expect the vaccine revenue for the year to be approximately $34 billion, up by $2 billion compared to our prior guidance. For PAXLOVID, we expect sales of approximately $22 billion, keeping the guidance range unchanged despite the negative incremental impact of changes in FX.”

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, and Former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, in Dec 2021 explained how the harm goes much further than myocarditis:

Screenshot Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi explains basic immunology. Click to watch the video.
Image description: A brown-skinned older man sits in a room with wall light fixtures and filled bookcases behind him. He is wearing glasses and his short dark hair has grey streaks. He is speaking and looking into the camera.

Here is some of what Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi said:

“Now, you know I’m getting very emotional because my people, the Thais, are getting targeted. And the people of India — and I also come from India — are targeted.”

Here is a July 2022 presentation from pathologist Dr. Ute Krueger of Lund University in Sweden. She shares her findings regarding COVID-19 vaccination and cancer:

Screenshot Click to watch the video.
Image description: A white woman sits in the center of the screen. The background behind her is blurred. She is wearing a beige cardigan with lace edges and a dark top underneath. She has short blonde hair and is wearing glasses.

This is some of what Dr. Ute Krueger says:

“In conclusion, the vaccination against COVID-19 seems to trigger on the one hand fast growing tumors, or turbo cancer, and on the other hand also inflammatory processes in the body, so-called autoimmune diseases. The tumor development may also be related to the inflammation since I often enough see inflammatory changes in the tumor and the surrounding mammary gland tissue.
Obviously, what I have described does not concern breast cancer only. I have heard from other pathologists that there is now an increased number of tumors that were hardly seen before, very rare tumors and that the number of cancer cases in different organs has increased.”
“I can say that I feel very weary. I studied medicine because I want to help people. But now it feels like I’m watching people being killed and there’s little I can do.”
“[…] I received very strong criticism […] And I was even told to withdraw my report. This I refused to do.”

All of these independent doctors, scientists, media outlets, or reporters I’ve shared have been attacked by the mainstream propagandists from every part of the political spectrum.

This is what I said on Oct 19, 2019 — before this pandemic — about how to know who is telling you the truth:

“If you want to know which media to believe, look for the ones who are attacked by the right, the center, and the left.”
“No one wants to be hated by everyone. Only the people who believe in telling the truth will take the hate because they believe in telling the truth.”
“The people being slandered by everyone, they are the only people telling you the truth.”

After 3 years of nothing but disaster, there is finally some hope for all the millions of working class people beaten down by the mainstream propaganda:

Conclusion

If you believed the propaganda for the last 3 years, it’s time to reevaluate every single part of your value system. Do you believe in truth no matter who speaks it? Or do you believe in your government and corporations regardless of their vested interest in controlling you?

If you believed the slander hurled at doctors and scientists who dissented from the mainstream narrative for the last 3 years, it’s time to evaluate your fragility and denial. Why are you so fragile about your government’s doctored statistics? What power and privilege do you lose by listening to independent dissenting voices? Why are you in so much denial about provable data? Why do you dismiss what dissenting scientific voices have to say about that data? Why do you go along with the mainstream narrative when they have a financial incentive to slant that narrative? Where is your fragility and denial coming from? How has your fragility and denial harmed the people you most care about? How has your fragility and denial harmed you?

Please don’t pretend that you were resisting the mainstream narrative the whole time. It’s time to admit our own culpability and adherence to imperialist power. I, for instance, did not go along with the narrative about the vaccine and vaccine mandates. I did, however, go along with the narrative about lockdowns and masks for the first year and I fully admit my culpability in that. I was wrong. The moment I realized I was wrong about the lockdowns and the masks and the mainstream narrative, I worked to correct my culpability by sharing resources and doing continuous research to make sure I was informed by independent sources. I had to confront many of my own prejudices and egoistic concerns about who was the “correct media” to read/follow, who’s resources I wanted to be seen sharing, and whether or not people would still like me if I spoke up. These were not frivolous concerns for me. Not being liked when you’re a community organizer supported by the community has very real financial consequences.

And I did, indeed, lose friends and support.

But the truth is the truth. The truth liberates regardless of whether or not I can pay my bills. Those who deny the truth are denying everyone collective liberation. I, therefore, cannot and will not deny the concerns that are shared by independent scientific voices. It’s my job to uplift them as a community organizer for justice.

If you also won’t deny them any longer, please share these resources I’ve shared with you.

“Fact check organizations commonly employ people with no relevant background to conduct checks of scientific claims made by reputable scientists and scientific papers. They typically have limited expertise, relying instead on appeals to authority but without a capacity to sift between competing authorities.
The ultimate ironic effect of the fact-checking enterprise — the Ministry of Truth — has been the promotion of misinformation. By boosting the demand for lockdown and COVID-restrictions, these errors have proven disastrous.”

— Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Stanford Professor, Congressional Testimony Nov 17 2021

Screenshot Image description: A color background showing a cloudy sky with. A headline in white font reads: “Great Barrington Declaration”. Below reads: “As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.”
“In Oct. 2020, I wrote the Great Barrington Declaration, along with Prof. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard University and Prof. Sunetra Gupta of the University of Oxford. The Declaration, signed now by over 10,000 scientists and 40,000 physicians, called for focused protection of the vulnerable elderly and an end to lockdown policies, including school closures and other measures which have caused enormous collateral damage to the health and well-being of the population.
Several prominent figures, including Anthony Fauci, reacted to the proposal by falsely mischaracterizing it as a herd immunity strategy to let the virus "rip" through society. This was pure propaganda. As I have said, our proposal called for focused protection of the vulnerable, who face a 1000 fold higher risk of mortality if infected than children do. The term "herd immunity strategy" is nonsensical. Herd immunity — sometimes called endemic equilibrium — is the endpoint of this epidemic, no matter what strategy we follow. The goal of policy should be to minimize harm from the virus and collateral damage from interventions until that state is achieved.”

— Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Congressional Testimony Nov 17 2021

A group of mostly white people wearing suits sit behind a row of dark tables. There are two cameras set up behind them and camera people standing at the back. There are two microphones on the tables. One brown skinned man in a brown/grey suit speaks. — Screenshot of a video from the House Freedom Caucus to hold COVID-19 accountability hearing. Click to watch the video.
Image description: A group of mostly white people wearing suits sit behind a row of dark tables. There are two cameras set up behind them and camera people standing at the back. There are two microphones on the tables. One brown skinned man in a brown/grey suit is speaking into one of the microphone. The name sign before him says Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

Screenshot A Jan 2023 paper by the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration outlining the failures of the government pandemic response.
Image description: Black font on white background reads: “QUESTIONS FOR A COVID-19 COMMISSION by The Norfolk Group”. Below are listed the names of the 8 scientist authors collectively called the Norfolk Group.

Screenshot A new documentary to give voice to the vaccine injured. Click to watch the documentary.
Image description: A dark background. On the right there is a hand wearing a blue medical glove holding a syringe inserted into a glass bottle with clear liquid. At the top in white font reads: “Safe and Effective - A Second Opinion (2022) | Oracle Films”. In the middle of the image is a play button.

Screenshot Image description: Black font on a white background reads: “Top Japanese Physician-Scientist Gives Dire Warning About COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: ‘Scientifically Misconceived’”.

“The harm caused by vaccines is now a worldwide problem.”
“Given the large number of people who have received vaccinations, and given the wide range of adverse events, billions of lives could ultimately be in danger.”
“This should never happen again.”

— Dr. Fukushima, Professor Emeritus of Kyoto University, Nov 25 2022

A brown-skinned man of middle age wearing a black suit jacket, white shirt, and red and blue striped tie sits on a black chair in the middle of the picture. Behind him is a beige background. To the left of the picture can be seen the arm of another. — Screenshot of the video of Dr. Fukushima speaking at a conference on Nov 25 2022. Click to watch.
Image description: A brown-skinned man of middle age wearing a black suit jacket, white shirt, and red and blue striped tie sits on a black chair in the middle of the picture. Behind him is a beige background. To the left of the picture can be seen the arm of another person wearing a black jacket. The caption reads in white font: “Dr. Masanori Fukushima: Vaccine damage is now a global problem. Billions of lives are at risk!”

Screenshot Image description: Article headline in black font on white background reads: “Covid pandemic sparked by accidental leak from Wuhan lab, US investigation concludes” and subtitle below reads: “The 300-page report into Covid origins finds leak was likely ‘unintentional resulting from failures of biosafety containment’”. Article is dated 18 April 2023.

US Senate Report: An Analysis of the Origins of the COVID-19 Pandemic Oct 2022

From the US Senate report:

“[…] there is no published genetic evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was circulating in animals prior to the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the genomes of early COVID-19 cases did not show genetic evidence, in the form of adaptive mutations that SARS-CoV-2 recently circulated in another animal species other than humans. Moreover, the genetic similarity between the environmental samples and 2002-2003 SARS-CoV 2019 Avian Influenza A H7N9 9 human viral samples supports the likelihood that the virus found at the Huanan Seafood Market was shed by infected humans, rather than by infected animals […]”
“While the absence of evidence is not itself evidence, the lack of corroborating evidence of a zoonotic spillover or spillovers, three years into the pandemic, is highly problematic.”
“There also do not appear to have been subsequent spillovers of the virus that generated sustained transmission in humans, or any other independent spillovers of SARS-CoV-2, from the intermediate host animal(s) to humans since the pandemic started. It is also noteworthy that the earliest variants of SARSCoV-2 were well-adapted for human-to-human transmission.”
“The EcoHealth Alliance NIH grants and DARPA grant proposals, in partnership with the WIV, sought to collect and conduct genetic recombination experiments on SARS-related coronaviruses with specific traits that made those viruses a “high-risk” for zoonotic spillover into animals and humans.215 SARS-CoV-2 shares many of the traits these researchers were interested in finding in SARS-related coronaviruses or interested in engineering such traits if they were not found naturally.”
“[…] substantial evidence demonstrating that the COVID-19 pandemic was the result of a research-related incident has emerged. A research-related incident is consistent with the early epidemiology showing rapid spread of the virus in Wuhan, with the earliest calls for assistance being located in the near the WIV’s original campus in central Wuhan. It also explains the low genetic diversity of the earliest known SARS-CoV-2 human infections in Wuhan, because the likely index case, would be an infected researcher, is the likely primary source of the virus in Wuhan. A research-related incident also explains the failure to find an intermediate host as well as the failure to find any animal infections pre-dating human COVID-19 cases.”
“WIV patents and procurements suggest that the WIV experienced persistent biosafety problems relevant to the containment of an aerosolized respiratory virus like SARS-CoV-2.”
“The low genetic diversity of the earliest SARS-CoV-2 samples, coupled with one of the two early lineages being more closely related to bat coronaviruses, suggests that COVID-19 pandemic is most likely the result of one, or at most two, spillovers of SARS-CoV-2.223 SARS-CoV-2’s low initial genetic diversity is also a break with the precedent of recent zoonotic spillovers of respiratory viruses.”
“Based on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident.”