White Women Predators
Brigitte Macron is currently the most famous example of a white woman sexually preying on a child.
*Trigger Warning* Pedophilia, grooming, child sex abuse, rape, rape culture, slavery, transphobia
Screenshot “A teenage Macron kissed his drama teacher on the cheek, who would become his wife”
This article is about Brigitte Macron’s “alleged” pedophilia. Before I can discuss that, however, first I need to talk about how Brigitte Macron, wife of President Emmanuelle Macron and First Lady of France, is currently suing Candace Owens for defamation.
In Candace Owen’s own words responding to Macron’s lawsuit, she says:
“If you need any more evidence that Brigitte Macron is definitely a man, it is just what is happening right now. […] We are revolting against the perverts that run the world and I want to be very clear here, I count you among them. I think you’re sick, I think you’re disgusting and I’m fully prepared to take on this battle.”
Owen’s accusation infers that Brigitte Macron is not a cis woman but a trans woman, as if being a trans woman is a crime. It seems to me that Candace Owens is only going after Brigitte Macron because she thinks that trans women are “perverts”.
Here’s the thing: Anyone, regardless of their status in life, should have the right to state their gender identity and be believed, and not be harassed due to their gender identity.
Therefore, I don’t care what Brigitte Macron’s gender is. She says she’s a cis woman and I will believe her until she herself says otherwise. I don’t need to see any pictures of her as a child (although there are pictures in her defamation lawsuit) or look at her DNA (which would be a gross invasion of anyone’s privacy).
Side note: Watching Candace Owens’ visceral hate for trans people is interesting. She seems so proud of hating trans people and that makes me wonder what is causing her hate. What is going on in Owens’ own psyche that leads her to attack a whole group of people she doesn’t even know?
Side side note: This case is a perfect example of how transphobia actually hurts cis women too.
My focus:
Going back years, I’ve pointed out on social media that Brigitte Macron is a predator who preyed on Emmanuelle Macron when he was a 15-year-old child, while she was his teacher and a married 39-year-old adult with 3 children of her own. My twitter account was suspended shortly before the 2024 presidential election (twitter never explained why and ghosted me when I asked for help) which is why I can’t show you screenshots or give you direct links. But anyone who followed me there knows that I’ve been saying this about Brigitte Macron for a while. This is not a new story for me.
It is my view that any suggestion of Brigitte Macron being a trans woman is irrelevant in this matter because there are plenty of cis women who are sexual predators of children, especially white women. Emmanuel Macron wasn’t vulnerable to his teacher because she was a “trans woman”. He was vulnerable because she was an adult and his teacher. Men are not the only pedophiles in imperialist culture.
Child sex abuse is part of white pedophile culture that goes all the way back to the cult of Adonis in ancient Greece. In that cult Greek women would worship Adonis, the goddess Aphrodite’s beautiful young lover. 3rd century BCE Greek Poet Theocritus described Adonis as “still an adolescent with down on his cheeks at the time of his love affair with Aphrodite”.
If you think that comparing a pedophile cult in ancient Greece to modern white culture today is unfair, here’s Eddie Izzard doing his stand up comedy Dressed to Kill in 1998 (which is just five years after Emmanuelle Macron met his teacher who would become his wife).
Izzard said:
“You know it’s cool to lose your virginity when you’re 13, you know, cos when you’re 13 you say: ‘Yeah, you know, I was just an animal. She was 25[…]’”
The crowd laughs at Izzard’s joke about a 13-year-old child losing their virginity to a 25-year-old woman. The crowd laughs. Dressed to Kill, the show where Eddie Izzard says this, is still one of Izzard’s most famous and successful shows. Even in 2025, westerners still love Dressed to Kill. Go look at the YouTube comments if you don’t believe me.
I remember watching Dressed to Kill as a child and not understanding what people were laughing about when he made that joke. Of course I didn’t understand it, I was a child. Even though I didn’t get it, I saw that the white adults thought it was hilarious and didn’t see any problem with it.
That’s because white women sexually preying on children is celebrated in western culture. It’s considered cool and romantic. It’s even considered feminist empowerment because white women are reversing the usual imperialist gender dynamics of older men with young girls. That is classic white feminism because white women don’t want to get rid of patriarchy, they want to gain the power of white men. So according to white feminists, it’s sexist to discuss Brigitte Macron’s age difference with her husband because no one questions Donald Trump’s age difference with his wife, which also happens to be 24 years just like the Macrons.
But child sex abuse is wrong no matter what the predator’s gender. Systemic child sex abuse is what we need to talk about and dismantle. And Donald Trump didn’t meet Melania Trump when she was a child, as far as I’ve been able to find, although neither of them have been clear about their first meeting and anything is possible with imperialists “alleged” to be involved with child sex trafficking and Jeffrey Epstein.
Here is the description of Brigitte Macron’s relationship with Emmanuelle Macron in her own defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens. This lawsuit has been filed in English language in the state of Delaware by US lawyers representing Brigitte Macron. Therefore there is no possibility of a language barrier or a mistranslation from French. The lawsuit states:
“22. President Macron attended La Providence, a Jesuit high school in Amiens, where he first met Brigitte Macron, a French and drama teacher. At the time, Mrs. Macron was an accomplished educator and mother of three. Their early interactions were centered around academic mentorship and a shared passion for literature and theater.”
“26. Through the school’s theatre program, President Macron and Mrs. Macron formed a deeper intellectual connection. During a school production of Jacques and His Master, President Macron played the lead role under Mrs. Macron’s direction. He later undertook an ambitious rewrite of another play, The Art of Comedy, to create roles for more students. Mrs. Macron agreed to guide him, and the two began meeting regularly to collaborate on the project.”
“27. At all times, the teacher-student relationship between Mrs. Macron and President Macron remained within the bounds of the law. But, when President Macron’s parents became aware of his strong feelings for his teacher, they decided to transfer him to Lycee Henri-IV in Paris. Mrs. Macron encouraged him to leave and was confident he would fall in love with a peer. Yet, before his departure, he told her, “Whatever you do, I will marry you.”
“29. Over the years, President Macron and Mrs. Macron kept in touch, and their love deepened. In 2006, Mrs. Macron divorced her first husband and in 2007, she married President Macron. Their relationship has remained strong and supportive, marked by a deep intellectual partnership.”
“33. Upon assuming office, President Macron formally established an official, unpaid role for the First Lady. In this capacity, Mrs. Macron represents France in diplomatic settings, supports charitable causes, and engages in initiatives related to education, health, disability, and child protection. Her responsibilities are supported by an advisory cabinet and two presidential aides.”
“34. Mrs. Macron is a strong independent woman who has consistently forged her own path. Throughout her life, she has refused to be confined by societal expectations or limited by traditional roles. As First Lady of France, she has made deliberate, thoughtful choices rooted in conviction and purpose.”
Brigitte Macron, “strong independent woman”, says in her own lawsuit against Candace Owens that Emmanuelle Macron’s parents were alarmed by his relationship with her. They were so upset that they transferred him to a completely different school in Paris, 120 km from their home in Amiens (that’s 74.56 miles), to separate their teen son from the much older woman.
Screenshot A partial map of France showing Paris, the distance to Amiens, the border further north with Belgium, and the English channel to the west.
Brigitte Macron also admits, in her own lawsuit, that she kept in touch with Emmanuelle Macron despite his parents’ clear attempt to protect their vulnerable son from her.
Her lawsuit states: “their love deepened”.
What love?
What love could exist between a 39-year-old woman and a 15-year-old boy that would “deepen” and lead to marriage years later? She’s admitting that they had an illicit relationship when he was a child and she his teacher.
If you’re shocked that Brigitte Macron would admit these details openly as if it’s normal for an adult woman to have a romantic affair with a child, and that her lawyers would let her admit it, your shock is because you don’t understand white women, white pedophile culture, and imperialist rape culture.
White women teachers are especially dangerous because they have easy access to children. Because they’re white, they have historically gotten away with preying on children all over the world. Doing so is totally normal to them. This Oprah article goes out of its way to excuse pedophile women teachers, who we know are largely white women, minimizing the danger of their behaviors such as grooming, sexual predation, and rape.
Do an internet search on “female teacher, student” and see how many illicit sex cases come up. Search for pictures of the teachers. See what race they are. Scroll and keep scrolling. You’ll be overwhelmed by the number of cases. You’ll lose count.
Systemic child sex abuse is a tactic of imperialism. That means that there are reasons why imperialist women sexually prey on children just like there are reasons why imperialist men do the same.
Think about the stories of Black and brown boys who got lynched for “raping” a white woman, only for the public to later find out that the white woman in question made up the claim. Why do you think white women make up such claims?
I think there’s a clue why white women do this in the book To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee, published in 1960. In To Kill a Mockingbird, the story of the jury trial is that Tom Robinson, a 25-year-old married Black man, is accused of raping a white woman, Mayella Ewell. A jury of all white men finds him guilty. He’s later shot dead while trying to escape prison. In the book, the reader finds out that it’s actually the white woman, Mayella Ewell, who tried to sexually prey on Tom Robinson against his own inclination. Tom Robinson had a freeze response to her behavior because he was afraid of what might happen to him as a Black man as a result of her actions.
There’s an even earlier book that’s similar to this. A Passage to India by E.M. Forster, published in 1924, tells a story of a white woman, Adela Quested, who goes to India to marry a white magistrate there. She then accuses an Indian Muslim man, Dr. Aziz, of sexually assaulting her. The story gives a glimpse into her mental state before the alleged “assault”: Adela Quested is unsure if she loves the white man she’s planning to marry. The next thing that happens is this white woman accuses an attractive Muslim Indian man of sexually assaulting her in an ancient Hindu / Buddhist / Jain cave. Later at trial she states that she cannot be sure what actually happened in that cave and withdraws her allegations.
Both of these books talk about men, not boys, but I bring them up because they are historical literary examples of the white woman using Black and brown males as sexual objects for the benefit of the white woman’s own agenda. This type of racial power dynamic being the subject matter of two fictional books on completely different continents, published 36 years apart, indicates that the notion of such behavior was prevalent in imperialist culture.
This literary trope goes even further back. Shakespeare’s “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” is a comedy play written in 1595 / 1596. In that play, Titania, the Queen of the Fairies, fights with her husband the Fairy King Oberon over her capture of an “Indian” slave boy:
“For Oberon is passing fell and wrath
Because that she, as her attendant, hath
A lovely boy stolen from an Indian king.
She never had so sweet a changeling.
And jealous Oberon would have the child
Knight of his train, to trace the forests wild.
But she perforce withholds the lovèd boy,
Crowns him with flowers and makes him all her joy.”
“Changeling” means a child stolen by fairies.
There is no doubt that Titania has erotic romantic feelings for this changeling Indian boy because the word “joy” is how sex and romance is referred to throughout the play. Here Puck says she made the “lovely boy” “all her joy”.
Titania later says to Oberon:
“Why art thou here,
Come from the farthest Steppe of India?
But that, forsooth, the bouncing Amazon,
Your buskin'd mistress and your warrior love,
To Theseus must be wedded, and you come
To give their bed joy and prosperity.”
Titania is then drugged by her husband Oberon into falling in love with Bottom (the rape culture of Oberon drugging and tricking his wife is a whole other article). In her drugged amorous state, Titania refers to Bottom as her “joy”:
“Come, sit thee down upon this flowery bed,
While I thy amiable cheeks do coy,
And stick musk-roses in thy sleek smooth head,
And kiss thy fair large ears, my gentle joy.”
The mortal lovers in the play are also referred to as “joy”.
“Here come the lovers, full of joy and mirth.
[Enter LYSANDER, DEMETRIUS, HERMIA, and HELENA]
Joy, gentle friends! joy and fresh days of love
Accompany your hearts!”
So it is clear that Titania has sexual feelings for the changeling Indian boy who she makes “all her joy”. Oberon is jealous but he isn’t angry that Titania has an Indian child slave who is “lovèd”, nor is he angry that she has a slave at all. Oberon is angry that she won’t give up that Indian boy for Oberon to enjoy himself. He asks Titania multiple times throughout the play to give him the boy. It’s the main cause of their marital conflict.
At no point is the “lovely” Indian boy’s age discussed although he is clearly a child described as a “boy”, “page”, “squire” while the white adults lust after him and control him in every way. At no point is there any suggestion in A Midsummer Night’s Dream that the “lovely” Indian boy should be free, or choose for himself who he wants to associate with, or go back safely to his own land.
Titania justifies herself in keeping the boy with her because she’s says his mother is dead:
“His mother was a votaress of my order:
And, in the spiced Indian air, by night,
Full often hath she gossip'd by my side,
[…]
But she, being mortal, of that boy did die;
And for her sake do I rear up her boy,
And for her sake I will not part with him.”
I wonder how his mother died…killed by a fairy queen, perhaps? Shakespeare doesn’t elaborate.
White people see a brilliant Shakespeare comedy when they watch or read A Midsummer Night’s Dream. I see Shakespeare unwittingly telling on white people, exposing the abduction and enslavement and rape of an “Indian” child by imperialist white adults under the guise of “friendship” with the child’s brown native mother.
Many people, including children, were enslaved by imperialists under such tricks. They still are.
The Indian boy himself has no lines in the play, nor does he have a name, nor is he ever even on stage. He is only discussed as a possession in the hands of imperialists.
Shakespeare wrote this play at a time when England had pirates — called “privateers” for respectability but they were government sanctioned criminals. These pirates were robbing ships on the seas. The irony is that they were robbing Spanish ships that were, of course, looting the colonies and enslaving the Indigenous peoples there. Those celebrated English pirates brought that twice looted booty back to Queen Elizabeth I who was Shakespeare’s patron.
That means that Shakespeare’s patron, the English Queen Elizabeth I, enjoyed a lot of stolen colonial loot.
So who do you think Shakespeare was actually talking about when he wrote of a Fairy Queen keeping an Indian slave boy and making him “all her joy”, “A lovely boy stolen from an Indian king”?
Centuries later, in 1993, French teacher Brigitte Macron preyed on her 15-year-old student, kept him emotionally tied to her for years, and married him when he was 29-years-old and she was 54. That victim, Emmanuelle Macron, later became President of France. As his wife and First Lady of France, Brigitte Macron is engaged in “initiatives related to education, health, disability, and child protection”.
Do you think that a woman who abused her power as a teacher by sexually preying on a child should be anywhere near national initiatives in education, health, disability, and child protection?
Do you think that a man who insists that the pedophilia he suffered as a child was “love” should be the leader of any country, and in charge of protecting that nation’s children?
Do you think that such a couple should ever be held up as an example of a healthy relationship for children in any country around the world?
Survivors often survive by appeasing their abuser. Some survivors end up helping their abuser hurt others, including children who recruit other children for their adult abuser.
What if Macron allows his white woman abuser to have power over France’s children to give her what she wants? To not consider that as a possibility when Brigitte Macron has already publicly admitted to a relationship with her student is irresponsible and endangers children everywhere.
Wider implications:
The people of France knew the story of Emmanuelle Macron marrying his teacher. They still elected him President in 2017, putting both Macron and his predator wife in charge of the nation’s children.
Just like the people of the US knew about the allegations of Joe Biden being a pedophile and a rapist and they still elected him President in 2020.
Just like the people of the US knew about the allegations of Donald Trump being a pedophile and a rapist and they still elected him President twice, in 2016 and 2024.
Think about that.
Think about how Eddie Izzard’s fans still laugh about a 13-year-old losing their virginity to a 25-year-old woman.
Think about how Shakespeare’s comedy A Midsummer Night’s Dream is still played around the world with everyone ignoring how the Indian boy was “stolen from an Indian king” and made the “joy” of a white woman imperialist.
Think.
White pedophile culture is so deeply engrained that the public doesn’t see it as abuse. They think that it’s “love deepened”.
The circumstance that makes white culture think a white woman’s pedophilia is wrong is if the guilty person is accused of being trans. It’s not white woman pedophilia that they’re opposed to, it’s someone being transgender.
That means that for years the French public viewed Brigitte Macron as a “strong independent woman” but now they’re wondering if she’s actually a woman at all. That’s the only reason why this story is getting traction — because Brigitte Macron is accused of being a man. Before that, everyone gave a gallic shrug at the news that Brigitte Macron had a romantic relationship with her 15-year-old student.
Besides the obvious point of deeply rooted transphobia, this means that if Brigitte Macron had never been accused of being a man, the whole world would continue ignoring her predation of a 15-year-old boy, and even worse, calling it the love story of a “strong independent woman”.
It’s proof that white women get away with pedophilia every day. Brigitte Macron has gotten away with it publicly for years.
Her lawsuit states:
“At all times, the teacher-student relationship between Mrs. Macron and President Macron remained within the bounds of the law.”
So what was the law in France in 1993 when they first met?
In truth, there was no actual legal age of consent in France in 1993, and continued to be no legal age of consent until 2021, as this France 24 report states:
“There is no minimum age of consent in France, which does not treat sex between an adult and a minor as rape unless there is proof of force.”
This BBC report concurs:
“French MPs have voted to back a new law that would set the age of consent at 15 and prohibit sex with relatives aged under 18.
It is expected to pass in the Senate and will give France an age of consent for sexual relations for the first time.”
This report from the Independent disturbingly romanticizes the Macrons’ relationship while stating that French law “defines the age of sexual consent as 18 in cases where one person has authority over the other.” But if that’s the case then why, in 2017, did this male French teacher avoid jail despite having sex with his 14-year-old student? As a teacher, he had authority over his 14-year-old girl student. So why didn’t he go to prison for having sex with her which is clearly rape?
In August 2020, French authorities decided to introduce a legal age of consent at only 15-years-old. They decided on 15 after first considering 13-years-old as their legal age of consent.
This is France, in a nutshell. That male teacher in 2017 didn’t go to prison for raping his 14-year-old student because French law has never protected children.
That means that in 1993, when Brigitte Macron met her 15-year-old student Emmanuel, having authority over him as his teacher, there was no working legal age of consent in France. Adults pretty much did whatever they wanted with the children in their power, all children, including students, including even blood relatives.
That explains why Hollywood director Roman Polanski fled to France after admitting to raping a 13-year-old girl in the US. He’s lived in France ever since, protected by France’s pedophile culture.
Remember, Brigitte Macron’s defamation lawsuit states:
“At all times, the teacher-student relationship between Mrs. Macron and President Macron remained within the bounds of the law.”
But there was no law. That means that Brigitte Macron is deliberately misleading the public with her lawsuit. Anyone in the US would assume that 1993 France must have had laws that protected children from predatory teachers or any predatory adult when in fact, France did not have any such law.
It’s interesting to me that Emmanuelle Macron himself supported 15-years-old for France’s first ever legal age of consent law. That’s the exact age he was himself when he met the teacher who preyed on him. Under France’s new law, Brigitte Macron having sex with Emmanuel Macron when he was 15-years-old would still be legal.
So even if Brigitte Macron’s lawsuit is referring to France’s current legal age of consent and not any previous age of consent based on her authority over him, she’s still misleading the public.
On top of that, this new law is fundamentally flawed. Obviously, 15-years-old is far too young for anyone to consent to have sex with an adult and also, the law has a giant loophole:
“But a so-called "Romeo and Juliet" clause will mean it is still possible for teenagers to consent to sex with each other, allowing for sex between a teen and a young adult up to five years older.”
Five years is a big age gap for still developing teenagers. It means that if an 18-year-old rapes a 13-year-old which happens all the time (like in the US here), in France that’s still legal. I was myself sexually assaulted by an 18-year-old male student in high school in California, when I was 13. There were witnesses, the entire high school saw it, and no one did anything to help me.
Emmanuelle Macron, his mind possibly warped by the trauma of childhood sexual abuse, might have thought that supporting 15-years-old for such a law would make him seem revolutionary and progressive. Instead, it seems to me like he unwittingly told on his wife and his school and his country, revealing how old he was when Brigitte Macron first “allegedly” raped him. Just like Shakespeare unwittingly told on his patron Queen, and English pirates, and white people in general when he threw an Indian slave boy into A Midsummer Night’s Dream. To me, it’s possible, even probable, that Brigitte Macron started having sex with Emmanuel Macron he was 15 and she was 39. I believe this because of their own words and actions.
Brigitte Macron continued teaching until 2015 when she gave teaching up to support her victim’s political career. That means that she kept teaching for over 20 years after she openly preyed on 15-year-old Emmanuel. French authorities continued to allow her near children, teaching children, with authority over children.
Why do you think Emmanuel Macron’s parents transferred him to a completely different school to try to separate him from the pedophile? Why do you think his parents didn’t get the predator teacher fired and imprisoned? Why do you think his parents didn’t go to the media to expose the school for allowing their son’s victimization? Because that school and the law and French media in general had no problem with Brigitte Macron sexually preying on her teenage student.
I doubt the teachers in the second school he was transferred to were any better.
Consider how many victims there must be in France when child sex abuse is this normalized and systemic. Consider how these French people must have spread their rape culture all over the world, in their colonies, in their traveling, in their sex tourism.
Like I said above, France is not the only country that is a sexual hell for children. The US is riddled with white women predators. So is the UK. So is every. imperialist. country.
Conclusion:
Not only are there pedophiles in imperialist governments running countries, there are pedophiles in the white wives of such government leaders. Those white women get away with pedophilia on a grand scale. They have gotten away with it for centuries.
Of course they get away with it, when imperialist rape culture itself romanticizes such predatory behavior.
It’s time we do something about that rape culture and about these white women predators.
Don’t let Candace Owen’s virulent hate for trans people distract you from the child sex abuse happening both on the world stage and all around you. Simultaneously, don’t allow Candace Owen’s virulent hate for trans people to manipulate you into hating queer and trans people. This is about protecting children, all children, including queer and trans children.
Child sex abuse is not going to stop until you do something grounded in reality to make it stop.
So learn about how systemic child sex abuse is a tactic of imperialism and how to dismantle this system of oppression.
Learn how systemic child sex abuse is a tactic of imperialism.
Resources
National Sexual Assault Hotline: 1–800–656–HOPE (4673)
National Domestic Violence Hotline: 1–800–799-SAFE (7233)
National LGBT Hotline: 1–888–843–4564
Hotline for 2SLGBTQIA+: 1–519–752-HELP (4357)